Assume for a minute that you do not have an underlying psychiatric or neurologic condition. You’re healthy. If you could take a pill that would significantly improve your memory, help you to concentrate through great distractions, keep you full of energy even though you’ve slept little, help you to be more social, or keep you from worrying much, would you take it?
That’s really the issue at stake with the concept of cosmetic psychiatry. Is it okay for psychiatry to evolve beyond simply treating disease and relieving suffering to the point where the goal is also enhancement of “normal” functioning? Read more…
Categories: ethics Tags: Archives of General Psychiatry, cognitive enhancement, cosmetic psychiatry, escitalopram, ethics, extraversion, Lexapro, medical necessity, neuroticism, paroxetine, Paxil, plastic surgery, Psychiatric Times, Ritalin, SSRI's
Imagine that as a child you thought you had been born in the body of the wrong gender. If you were biologically male, in your mind you really thought of yourself as female. Likewise, if you were born in a girl’s body, you thought that you were actually a boy.
Yes, you were probably more interested in children’s role-playing games more often associated with the opposite gender as well, but the issue went much deeper than that. It was your core identity that was at stake. You knew that you were the other sex, at least in all ways except for the reproductive organs of your body.
You felt this way during childhood, but nobody seemed to understand or accept this about you. But you were dressed in the clothing of your biological gender and expected to participate in the activities stereotypically associated with it as well. Imagine that as your body matured in adolescence, you hated your Read more…
Categories: ethics, prison sexuality Tags: discrimination, gender identity, harassment, health care, inmates, NY Times, prison, prison sexuality, prisoners, sex reassignment surgery, tolerance, transgender, transsexual, violence
The Archives of General Psychiatry published an article this month entitled, “Metabolic Testing Rates in 3 State Medicaid Programs After FDA Warnings and ADA/APA Recommendations for Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs.”
The retrospective analysis examines how frequently the recommended metabolic testing for second generation antipsychotic drugs (SGA’s) was performed in Medicaid patients in 3 different states. The conclusion was that the monitoring was not being done nearly as frequently as recommended. Less than one-third of patients treated with these medications, which can cause metabolic syndrome, undergo serum glucose or lipid monitoring.
Obviously this is not good news. In recent years, we’ve learned that the risks associated with SGA’s is higher than originally thought. My intent in this post, though, is not to focus on this study itself as much as to examine an ethical dilemma related to it that I have never heard discussed.
What I’ve been wondering: Is it ever appropriate to prescribe SGA’s to severely mentally ill patients who have no financial means to obtain the necessary blood monitoring tests? I’ll explain. Read more…
Categories: antipsychotics, ethics Tags: Archives of General Psychiatry, atypical antipsychotics, community mental health, ethical dilemma, first generation antipsychotics, indigent patients, informed consent, laboratory monitoring, Medicaid, metabolic monitoring, metabolic syndrome, psychosis, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, second generation antipsychotics, serious mental illness, typical antipsychotics
Recent Comments